The next years are going to be fun… The world is burning while the fossil fuel industry is chugging along like everything is great as long as you buy enough co2 credits.

I’m scared in what kind of world my children will have to live in…

  • Larakine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair (and the article does sort of mention this) we are in an El Nino year, so of course things are heating up terrifying fast. Thing is, El Ninos are impacted by climate change, so… This isn’t a cop-out, it’s just this is kind of as bad as it can get (for now) which is reassuring (hopefully?)

    • Velasquez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would disagree: Since we’re still in the early phase of a new (super? As is being discussed) El Niño — later this year and likely next 1-2 year/s will probably be worse.

      • Larakine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It really depends on so many things. AR6 was a depressing read, but we do still have different pathways, people are responding to the crisis. I have the privilege of seeing first hand the commitments being made by some rather large emitters and the actions being undertaken to meet those commitments. I guess what I’m saying is, we can still hope. We shouldn’t give-up and resign ourselves to this fate.

        On the other hand we literally have a CEO of a gas and oil company chairing COP28 next year… So… Yeah…

        • awderon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We need a system to hold those in power responsible for their promises and inactions.

          I don’t trust corporations, the only thing important for them is the balance sheet, they will always take the easy and cheap way. There should be a world wide tax on all companies which decreases with the companies sustainability. Hit corporations where it hurts them: money.

          • RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The system is violence. Threat of violence is the only thing that would ever keep in check politicians and big business. Voting declares the people’s will, but it is only backed by the threat of violence. Otherwise the people may say their will but the elite will not care. Hopefully things will become desperate enough for the violence to occur before it’s too late

            • SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              While I understand where you’re coming from, do keep in mind that the same people that can afford to keep chugging along on the same path with only the bottom line in their crosshairs also have enough influence to make sure that once violence starts it gets promptly redirected. And masses of upset people aren’t really coherent enough to keep a single goal in mind.

              Hell, if you’ve ever tried to get 12 hungry people to eat lunch at the same time and decide on a place to get it from, you’ll shortly understand what the phrase ‘herding cats’ means. Add to that a random 13th person that just pops up, whose neighbour owns the new lunch place on the corner and just ‘offers other options’ and you can quickly see how getting lunch becomes an exercise in futility.

              And if smoke, mirrors and redirection don’t work, civil violence is used as a pretext to intervene with force against protestors.

              I honestly don’t believe another French revolution is capable of happening again, ever.

              The answer could be voting with your wallet, but remember the ‘no preorders’ crowds? See my point about herding cats.

    • DanglingFury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Life finds a way, and if your in a well developed nation with a strong military you will be among the last to feel the full impact of it.

      I felt this way before, but decided screw it, if people can laugh and smile and love, even if it’s only on occasion, while they work in a hell hole like a electronics recycling dump in Africa, then it’s still worth it to exist. Just teach them to hunt and garden and stuff and give them the best chance you can.

  • Cyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The world failed to take action against climate change, now they’re going to be late to take action to the adaptation of civilization to a dangerous environment. Too late to stop climate change, it’s time to think about adapting to a new environment.

    • awderon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Humanity can certainly adept to climate change, but these changes will also cause a lot of people to relocate. I’m not sure if society, in the current political climate, can adapt quick enough to be able to deal with the influx of possible climate refugees.

  • DanglingFury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’ll be fine. It has all happened before. There was 5x to 10x as much CO2 in the atmosphere when the dinosaurs were alive (2000 to 4000 ppm).

    All we need to do is kill off about 7 billion people and have the survivors move to the south pole atleast 300’ above sea level.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Climate change is one of the biggest reasons I don’t want children. I can’t put blinders on and then feel zero responsibility for dragging them into a hopeless nightmare.

    • awderon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      El Niño is the least of our problems. Even the article mentions it only in passing.

      • guriinii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        El Niño is a major problem. Before it kicked in the North Atlantic sea surface temperature was a full degree above last years record breaking temperature. The addition of el Niño, this summer, could have a terribly effect on Arctic sea ice extent, and potentially catastrophic next year summer.

        Also the Antarctic sea ice is freezing at the slowest rate since they started recording in 1979, it is currently 2 million km2 below where it should be. As the extent will be so low at the peak of the southern hemisphere’s winter, the melt season in summer, with the sea being hotter due to el Niño, is going to be pretty fucking bad. And with less white ice to reflect the heat, and more dark ocean to absorb it, it will get even hotter!

        We temporarily crossed the 1.5°C threshold earlier this month. Next year it is likely we’ll cross is more frequently.

        El Niño while it is a cycle, because things are so fucked at the moment, it will only hasten ecological collapse.

        Oh and it might finally kill off most coral.

        • awderon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t want to downplay El Niño in any way. It’s just one of the problems we are facing.

          • guriinii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Agree but I do think that our climate and weather systems are so complex that it’s just one big thing. It’s all interconnected. Like the soot from wild fire smoke landing on glaciers and sea ice, reducing albedo, increasing temperatures, making el Niño more hotter, causing more wild fires.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think the person brought up a point about El Nino and I was hoping to see an educated comment explaining why they were wrong, instead I just saw a lazy comment lolz quality comment.

            • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah yes i have to be wrong because? The biggest Water evaporation zone is shifting places, African countries see immense raining, Europe a very inconsistent summer and usa a super hot one, these changes don’t come from climate change itself, thats El Nino. I literally said that climate change makes it more impacting.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think the person brought up a point about El Nino as a thread derailment tactic, and deserves to be downvoted for said bad-faith action.

        • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This type of dismissal is a type of climate change denial.

          “These things happen naturally.”
          “The climate might be changing but it’s not as bad as is being portrayed.”
          “Climate change might be happening but it’s not manmade.”
          “Of course the climate is changing, we’re exiting an ice age.”

          Some or all of the above might sound reasonable but a certain type of person bounces from excuse to excuse without recognizing or admitting there’s an actual catastrophe brewing.

  • izzent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Obviously the dude is not a biologist… Earth is gonna be fine long term, the other species are gonna be fine long term. The only thing we’re running into the ground is ourselves.

    Edit: check out all these clowns below who have a human superiority complex so inflated that they believe the earth will die with us 😂🤡

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Earth is gonna be fine long term

      It’s a metaphor.

      Like when people say “The economy is in trouble”, no one really cares about the economy itself. The economy will be fine. Even if it crashes by 90%, it’s still an economy, right?

      What we mean when we use these metaphors is, how the life of people living in these systems will be affected.

      Maybe a better analogy to the title is the life support system of a spaceship. If that system flashes you with warning lights, you’ll be worried, but not because the spaceship itself is in trouble. It will travel through space and time just fine, eons after it’s passengers have suffocated.

      • izzent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        A better way to phrase this, is that you believe humans deserve to live because of your own ego about your worth compared to the entire planet. Carry on.

        • Spzi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s maybe what you read, but not what I said. Putting words in mouths is a dishonest approach to conversation. Can we do better, please?

          The idea was based on the assumption that one does not want humans to suffer.

          Now when people talk about some ‘vital signs’ of a system in which humans live, be it economy, space ship or planet, it is usually meant and understood that they care about the wellbeing of the inhabitants, not about the state of the soulless system, even if that’s what they literally say. It’s a metaphor.

      • izzent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you heard of evolution or are you one of those loons that believe “god” placed a set number of species on the planet and that’s all there will ever be? Asking for a friend.

        • SumWon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Evolution works on very long time spans. Anthropomorphic climate change will be way too fast for species to evolve and adapt. I highly doubt all life will ever be wiped out on Earth, but we might lose 99% of current species with new species evolving over time. This is our dinosaur asteroid moment for sure.

          • izzent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            And yet, life survived even the asteroid. It’s arrogant as all hell to believe we have more destructive power than that asteroid. Or that we deserve to live on a planet we are destroying.

            • kaffiene@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              We are living through a mass extinction event right now. We have driven hundreds of species extinct even before getting deeply into the effects of climate change so it’s fascinating that you think that even more severe environmental change will harm no species at all.

              • izzent@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You clearly love putting words in people’s mouths. Utterly unrelated to what I said. Congrats on your irrelevance.

  • Dear Faye@halubilo.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it bizarre it doesn’t bother me that much about what happens to humanity at this point? Scientists have seen this happening decades ago and have implored companies and governments to make changes, only to land in deaf ears… so in a way, we saw this coming and didn’t care. We kinda had it coming. What I really worry for are the innocent animals, fauna, and flora that will definitely be affected by this. It upsets me even just a change in temperature can mean life or death for some species. I just hope we can still slow this down enough for them to be able to adapt too 😥

    • dropte_eth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sorry you feel that way, but I get where you’re coming from.

      Zoom out a little though and it’s consequences are war, famine, and desecration.

      If not the human suffering, consider eons long chains of biology that’ll be wiped off the face of the earth as climates shift quicker than their ability to adapt

      • arcrust@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ha. That will be wiped off? We are actively watching a mass extinction occur. It’s not going to happen. It already is

        • dropte_eth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I remember watching a clip from “The Network” where Jeff Daniel’s is interviewing an expert on climate change. It was when it was too late - and the expert lore or less said so.

          It struck me as prescient - that despite all the warnings we’d be shocked when it came and it was irreversible.

          Tbh it came sooner than I expected.

  • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weather and even temperature are a bit of a red herring in all this. The extreme weather is caused by the rising temps and feedback loops, but what’s happening is just the heat trying to normalize. We’re not going to end up with 70c at the equator and -30c at the poles. Look at the cretaceous temp, CO2, and fossil records and you’ll see that the temp evens out even with CO2 massively higher then today, and you end up with things like temperate rainforest at the south pole. Our real issue and the one we should be actively fighting against (as in actual in-the-street rebellion) is the absolute destruction of the environment. Chemical dumping, strip mining, industrial fishing, industrial agriculture, forever chemicals, microplastics, desertification and deforestation. These things are going to cause ecological collapse and kill almost everyone in the next generation or two, no question about it. We don’t have to worry about the heat getting us

    • awderon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are right, all these other problems are also really bad. A lot of stuff is happening at the same time. It’s hard for me to read about all the shit that is going down and not be able to do anything impactful against these things.

      • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah its really tough and I try to limit my doomscrolling to the amount needed to stay informed. One huge problem with all this is that it effects the most privileged the least, and even the day to day things we can do to feel like we’re helping are only really available to those of us with that privilege. Like, I could say “start a vege garden, buy hemp and wool clothes, fix things in your workshop instead of buying new” but yeah, those aren’t really options most people can take unless we change the underlying structure of our society first. But then, why don’t we try changing society so we can then fix these issues? In the end, it’s all part of the class war, and we’re losing badly.

        • awderon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m living in a flat, this limits what I can do on my own. But I’m looking into getting some solar panels to put up on the balcony, coupled with a storage battery this should bring down the kW/h I need from an external provider.

          In the far future I would like to move out of the city and start producing more of my own food, but prices are just to high right now.

          • ThinlySlicedGlizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t be convinced that by lowering your impact you can make any change. Corporations want you to think that because if the masses think that they are the issue then they can continue what they are doing. The only way we can contribute is if we all get on the streets and protest. If millions of people get out on the streets for an indefinite amount of time, stop working, stop buying things, and demand change then we will get change.

            • jantin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              no, those peple will be just mowed down by automatic weapons fire until put in their place.

              AI’s creators are taking care to ultimately obsolete as many people as possible. If you’re not a source of profit to a capitalist you’re disposable. If you’re a source of a cost then you’re to be disposed of as fast as possible. There are several billion people fleeing uninhabitable areas, they’ll gladly replace spoiled woke kids at their spots in factories and glass towers.

              Sorry for bluntness but this is the reality in the minds of those who rule.

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Weather and even temperature are a bit of a red herring in all this. The extreme weather is caused by the rising temps and feedback loops, but what’s happening is just the heat trying to normalize.

      More and more severe extreme weather events are a bad thing, aren’t they?

      Environmental destruction is bad, yes. But climate change causes a host of major issues (adding ocean acidification to your list). Rising temperatures and extreme weather certainly will cause deaths and trouble long before the heat normalized, if that ever happens.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bad weather is also expensive AF. There’s a reason reinsurers such as MunichRE aren’t on the climate change denial train: They see the writing on the wall of not being able to back the insurers you buy your flood insurance from at a price point anyone could afford. If the damages become too high on aggregate, things simply become uninsurable (hence also why states don’t require nuclear plants to have insurance but back them themselves but that’s another can of hidden subsidy worms).

        People are talking about “but investment in climate-friendly technology costs money and we must think of the economy and prosperity” – motherfucker if you were thinking about prosperity and the economy you wouldn’t set us on a path towards cities being destroyed faster than we can build them. Broken window fallacy times a million.

  • axtualdave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember, elections have consequences. While, at least in the US, neither party is perfect, Republicans are actively engaged in climate denial.

    Vote accordingly.

    • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Elections sort of have consequences sometimes. In some places. Especially in the US, both sides play the same game and both allow corporations to act with enough impunity for it to make no difference who is in charge. The fact that “democracy” has become a choice between two essentially identical options tells you everything you need to know about the idea. Not to mention that the US is a republic not a democracy anyway and is therefore a totally different beast. And the second biggest economy and influence on the climate is China - another “democracy” which isn’t one.

      • JudgeHolden@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “the US is a Republic not a democracy…”

        Thanks for telling us that you don’t know WTF you’re talking about.

        This idea of yours, that republics and democracies are somehow mutually exclusive concepts is a deeply stupid category error that has zero basis in political science (to say nothing of practical reality) and almost always is the redoubt of those who wish to justify the dysfunction of the current status quo.

        • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s no need to get upset about it mate. At least not about my comment. Please do get upset about (I assume) your government. Its a shitshow. I never said anything about mutual exclusivity, all I said is that being a republic, the rulesa re different to what they would be otherwise. Gerrymandering, the executive branch, the judicial branch, and especially the electoral college, all mean that even though some people are allowed to vote, power lies with the political class and oligarchs, not with the people voting.

          Here’s some handy info about republics: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic

      • JudgeHolden@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “the US is a Republic not a democracy…”

        Thanks for telling us that you don’t know WTF you’re talking about.

        This idea of yours, that republics and democracies are somehow mutually exclusive concepts is a deeply stupid category error that has zero basis in political science (to say nothing of practical reality) and almost always is the redoubt of those who wish to justify the dysfunction of the current status quo.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It seems like elections only have consequences and never any benefits. While republicans are worse than democrats, I don’t see democrats moving effectively in this area. It’s usually business as usual with democrats (e.g. Biden signing in more drilling permits). At best I see too-little-too-late agreements with non-strict enforcement that republicans can cancel any time they get power (which is inevitable in our system).

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        While republicans are worse than democrats,

        That doesn’t really matter - the problem is they enable each other. They just play a “good cop, bad cop” routine while “business as usual” accelerates. Political parties aren’t interested in changing the status quo - but it’s the status quo that must be changed.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I’ve had to make sure to include that in every post I make criticizing democrats because otherwise people who’ve had their brains poisoned by the two party system immediately jump to stupid conclusions like “oh, are you saying we should vote for republicans then?!?!?!” or try to dismiss all criticism by pointing out the obvious in that republicans are worse.

          The thing with good cop, bad cop is that they both have the same objective and neither are on your side. It’s a great act, too, because people actually get fooled into thinking parties bought and paid for by the rich are somehow fighting for the common person.

  • amesoeurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m a severe weather meteorologist for a government org (non-US). This is alarmist nonsense. There is plenty of proper statistical evidence for climate change, it’s bizzare that the opinion of one irrelevant meteorologist is being voted up to the front page. Most of the weather forecasters I work with know very, very little about climate change (as do most posters on here who love to type in short, sharp sentences to make themselves seem authoritative).

    • JudgeHolden@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And your point is? Are you arguing that alarmism isn’t called for? That everything is fine and we shouldn’t try to mitigate emissions?

      Or are you simply arguing that most weather forecasters know very little about climate change so… I guess I don’t know what?

      Again, what’s your point? Are you just flexing or do you actually have something useful to contribute to the conversation?

      • amesoeurs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Read my comment again. There is plenty of good statistical evidence for climate change, and if something is going to be bumped up to the front page it should be from a reputable source. Not “random nobody weather forecaster says thing”

        • awderon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think every article that gets people to talk about the problems we are collectively facing is doing it‘s job.

          For some people this might be the trigger to have a deeper look into the topic, because a more relatable person for them is pointing out a problem.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you think there should be a climate change article from a more reputable source on the front page, then post one instead of uselessly complaining. Put up or shut up.

    • kinther@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So when I see records being broken every year, year after year, I’m supposed to be like “This is fine”.

      Got it.

    • awderon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude, if you don’t have anything useful to contribute just save the energy your comment is taking up.

      If you are just here to attack people without making a point go back to reddit.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You mean you don’t like the VERY OBVIOUS point I made. Well, tough! Having children today is massively irresponsible, and only assholes and ostriches are still doing it. Is that clear enough for you? Do I need to dumb it down further? The reference to ostriches refers to a cliche where those birds are said to cover their eyes when danger is around, so they are not upset by it.

        • awderon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Your last comment just didn’t add anything to the discussion besides attacking. I can understand where you are coming from, but sometimes things happen and change the way you are looking at things.

          Edit: After reading your edit it seems you are angry at the wrong people. At least you have chosen an appropriate username.

  • Blamemeta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Like we have for the last century? At some point, the doom sayers gotta be taken down a notch.

    Remember when it was Global Cooling?

    • FarFarAway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok, but I wouldn’t say this is the same at all. They talked about global cooling, they weren’t living in it.

      The climate is getting hotter, faster than any other period in history. Other warming events have taken thousands of years, this warming event has happened in 150 years. This is irrefutable fact, as we have the temperature records to prove it.