• VonReposti@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    You can run a fully fletched LLM at home but you can’t train the model. The latter is a huge contributor to power consumption. Running it is peanuts in comparison.

    • vivendi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      That is a one time cost. Do you add the cost of every single watt of electricity ever generated, the cost of making factories, extracting materials and so on, to the “climate impact” of electrical rail service or EVs?

      This is just hysteria, I’m going to be absolutely deadass with you

      Also, you theoretically could make an LLM entirely on your own PC, it’d just take a bit of time

      • VonReposti@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes I do in fact. We need to lower the economical impact of production too, consumption is just a drop in the bucket. To put it in perspective, I can run my PC from a second hand generator. Most low end generators might even be able to run 10s of my PCs. A datacenter training the high end LLMs that I could be running needs a nuclear power plant worth of energy. We are talking multiple magnitudes of difference.

        I suppose you don’t consider the coal-powered electricity that powers your EV when reflecting over your impact too?

        • vivendi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          OK you walk the walk I respect that

          If you could be arsed, it’s entirely possible to train an LLM with 10 PCs using strictly open source and ethical datasets available on huggingface (although not something that is going to beat SOTA models)