• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Me: “Contrite”

    Autocorrect: “Did you mean Concrete?”

    Me: “No. Add to Dictionary

    Me: “Finagle”

    Autocorrect: “Did you mean Final?”

    Me: “No! Add to Dictionary

    Me: “Catapult”

    Autocorrect: “Bro, I don’t even know what that word is but I’m going to assume its misspelled.”

    Me: “God damnit. Add to Dictionary

    Me: “Phras”

    Autocorrect: “This is fine.”

    • Inktvip@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone that has to search for obscure hardware and part numbers on a regular basis Google’s ‘did you mean’ is the bane of my existence.

          • lol3droflxp@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Personally I’m quite happy with DuckDuckGo. It seems to take stuff more literal than Google so keywords are handled better in my opinion. It isn’t trying to be as smart basically, has its pros and cons.

      • gkd@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Using quotes around the part number might be of great help. It won’t ask you “did you mean” and will look specifically for pages that include that number.

        • Inktvip@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately that works less and less as “AI” continues to be more important in gathering results. Luckily there are other tricks like searching for pdfs only, exclude the ‘corrected’ words , or simply trying multiple search engines.