A streamlined and sustainable app deployment approach with Mobifree | F-Droid - Free and Open Source Android App Repository
f-droid.org
Imagine you created your very first app. You developed the concept, workedtirelessly on the key features, design, tested it and fixed the bugs. Themoment has...
  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
    1604·
    3 months ago

    Paid apps: no problem. If it’s good, I’ll pay.

    Subscription: maybe, if it’s worth it.

    Ads: F-Droid can fuck right off. If they do that, they’d be a miserable bunch of sellouts.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldEnglish
      492·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, as long as the payment method is FOSS, secure, and works as intended, I have no serious issue with pay-once software being introduced. There are apps from F-Droid I would pay a few dollars to use if required, and I’d be happy if it meant more and higher-quality software.

      I feel like the freemium model they mention with subscriptions is just begging for F-Droid to be enshittified. F-Droid would really, really need to prove themselves with pay-once applications first for my liking before moving onto something so much more drastic.

      And then ads are just a non-starter. Ads only exist to be psychologically manipulative, they’re obnoxious as fuck in the present day, they’re a privacy nightmare, and they’re a vector for malware. I would see it as a betrayal of what F-Droid does for me, and I would actively see F-Droid as being sellouts who are only marginally better than using Aurora at that point.

    • sovietknuckles[they]@lemmy.mlEnglish
      219·
      3 months ago

      If they were talking about Privacy-Preserving Attribution like Firefox is experimenting with supporting on MDN, that would be one thing, but it doesn’t sound like that’s what F-Droid is talking about.

      Not only are privacy and data protection founding principles for both Mobifree and F-Droid, the use of tracking-based in-app advertising poses a moral dilemma as well. If someone wants to gain access to an app, but does not have the financial means to purchase it, they can use it at a different kind of price - their user data.

      F-Droid is also considering ads that contain no tracking, which removes that moral dillema, IMO:

      It should be mentioned that it is possible to include in-app advertising without user tracking. However the lead conversion ratio drops dramatically, so the efficacy of this approach is not nearly as high.

      That’s basically what PPA is, advertising without tracking. If advertisers want to pay for it, then great.

      Edit: Downvoting without responding like lemmitor

      • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
        27·
        3 months ago

        F-Droid is also considering ads that contain no tracking, which removes that moral dillema, IMO:

        You assume everybody is okay with ads.

        I’m not. My brainspace has been highjacked since I was a little kid by stupid advertisers. To this day, I remember ads for products that have disappeared decades ago and that I never gave a shit about at any point in my life.

        Why are advertisers allowed to force their shit into my head?

        I hate ads. I’m utterly intolerant of advertising. I hate the tracking and the malware that come with ads, but I hate ads even more. There are no moral ads. The advertisement industry is a despicable leech that needs to die.

        If F-Droid springs this shit on me, I swear to god I’m gonna start having murderous thoughts…

        • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
          2·
          3 months ago

          My brainspace has been highjacked since I was a little kid by stupid advertisers. To this day, I remember ads for products that have disappeared decades ago and that I never gave a shit about at any point in my life.

          Why are advertisers allowed to force their shit into my head?

          I hate ads. I’m utterly intolerant of advertising.

          This. So much this.

        • Auli@lemmy.caEnglish
          2·
          3 months ago

          Would you pay a monthly fee for everything? YouTube Facebook Reddit random site you visit. We would need like a found in our browser and every site you visited took there chunk out or something like that. People seem to forget this stuff costs money to run.

          • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
            2·
            3 months ago

            If the service is worth it and subscribing isn’t yet another opportunity to put me under surveillance - which is the main reason why, although I consume a lot of YouTube videos and I would genuinely pay Google for the service, I won’t - yes.

            Hint: Facebook and Reddit aren’t worth it. If they want to exit the ad-supported business model and disappear behind a paywall, I won’t miss anything in my life.

      • eco_game@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
        11·
        3 months ago

        The first quote is taken out of context:

        Not only are privacy and data protection founding principles for both Mobifree and F-Droid, the use of tracking-based in-app advertising poses a moral dilemma as well. If someone wants to gain access to an app, but does not have the financial means to purchase it, they can use it at a different kind of price - their user data.

        For me this reads as them explaining and condemning that dilemma, instead of considering it as an option for F-Droid.

        • sovietknuckles[they]@lemmy.mlEnglish
          8·
          3 months ago

          Sorry, I was trying to save space, but I can see how only starting the quote in the middle of the paragraph is misleading. I edited the quote to include the context.

          For me this reads as them explaining and condemning that dilemma, instead of considering it as an option for F-Droid.

          IMO, it read more like acknowledging concerns around ads but not explicitly condemning it. But I’m not going to form an opinion about it until they do something, or at least make their intentions clearer.

        • sovietknuckles[they]@lemmy.mlEnglish
          7·
          3 months ago

          ads in Firefox

          That’s a common misconception. For users like myself who use uBlock Origin, Firefox supporting PPA changes nothing at all (as pointed out by the Firefox CTO). The only users who would see an ad that uses PPA are users who would otherwise see ads that use tracking.

          That is why the EFF supports it.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
            04·
            3 months ago

            That is just dancing around the issue. The problem is them turning on baked in browser advertising by default.

            • sovietknuckles[they]@lemmy.mlEnglish
              6·
              3 months ago

              Again, it’s not advertising, it’s a form of privacy protection. There are no ads in Firefox, and they did not add any mechanism for tracking users, so calling it browser advertising is advertising your own technology illiteracy.

  • vomitaur@slrpnk.netEnglish
    79·
    3 months ago

    pretty sure the venn diagram of f-droid users and adblocking users is such a huge overlap that this may not pay off too well.

    • huginn@feddit.itEnglish
      174·
      3 months ago

      If you want devs to make apps without any monetization you’re limiting the number of devs that will develop for your platform.

      Free only means you only allow passion projects that people work on as a side project or only the developers rich enough to have retired already.

      Nobody who is struggling to get by can spend all their time developing a free app that has 0 monetization.

      So they monetize on Google Play.

      If you care about breaking Google’s control of Android you should cheer on another paid marketplace, especially one out of the clutches of Amazon.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        265·
        3 months ago

        If you want devs to make apps without any monetization you’re limiting the number of devs that will develop for your platform.

        So?

        The point of fdroid is not to have evil pieces of shit injecting their apps with spyware and ads.

        • FierySpectre@lemmy.worldEnglish
          93·
          3 months ago

          Developers deserve to be paid for their time though…

          Sure for many it’s nothing but a hobby and they’re happy to create something for free. But that doesn’t mean every developer needs to do the same.

          And yes ads are a privacy nightmare and putting them into your app is bad. So either you only use apps from hobbyists or you pay for access (whether that be a set price for a finished product or a subscription for a service).

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.worldEnglish
        12·
        3 months ago

        F-Droid is literally just a repository. Linux manages it just fine to have repo driven “store” apps.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.caEnglish
        7·
        3 months ago

        Cryptomator is available on F-Droid but you still have to purchase a license to use it, although the dev has to maintain all the licensing and payment infrastructure which can be a roadblock for some.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
        63·
        3 months ago

        Free means freedom not cost.

        The problem with online payments is that they compromise privacy and require use of proprietary software and centralized servers

  • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
    36·
    3 months ago

    What the fuck? Did F-Droid change ownership (sell out to a hedge fund or something)? Or did I somehow time-travel to April 1, or what?

  • jadelord@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    31·
    3 months ago

    If it is a pay what you want model I am all for it. This would be similar to how elementary OS st

    The problem with a fixed price is you have to always calibrate it according to the economy of the user’s geolocation. What is cheap for a person from a developed world may be unaffordable for a third world county.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6·
      3 months ago

      I would be totally down with a pay what you want model with most proceeds going to devs.

      Basically a prompt to donate to the devs with 5-10% going to the package manager.

      Some apps I’ve used are totally worth $1-$5

      • smeeps@lemmy.mtate.me.ukEnglish
        3·
        3 months ago

        Maybe it should be a pay what you want but it doesn’t charge you for a week. So you can use the app and then decide whether to up the price if it’s useful or cancel the payment if it doesn’t work for you.

        • Landless2029@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          3 months ago

          I like the delayed charge since you can’t return a donation.

          Something like a default of 14 days adjustable to 0-30 or reoccurring (default annual).

          This is all turning into a nice idea into an alt android package manager you can sub to repos.

  • LCP@lemmy.worldEnglish
    29·
    3 months ago

    Targeted advertising is a huge no. No more of that.

    Static advertising I can accept, but then who’s responsible for vetting ads? I don’t want scams displayed everywhere.

    Devs definitely need ways to support themselves and sustain development. I’ve shared this screenshot from the app Secure Tether before:

    I like to chip in a few bucks to my most used apps/services that are donationware, but after all the middlemen take their cut, the devs are left with peanuts. This IMO is the biggest hurdle when it comes to online monetization. A less expensive way to donate will certainly help.

    Additionally, there are people who cannot or will not pay for apps, and I don’t want to exclude them from being able to use an app/service they need.

    Monetization like how Reddit Gold was and how Discord Nitro is are some of my favorites. Few extra perks and cosmetic features for paying users. Free users are still able to use the main product at no cost and you can gift them Gold/Nitro if they aren’t able to purchase it themselves. I don’t know how that would translate into an app store model though.

  • zecg@lemmy.worldEnglish
    291·
    3 months ago

    Ads, no, are not ok. F-droid can fuck right off if an ad appears, I’ll just get apks from github

    • Lumisal@lemmy.worldEnglish
      81·
      3 months ago

      This is a good right to mention Obtanium, which is an app that basically streamlines that

    • limerod@reddthat.comMEnglish
      92·
      3 months ago

      Those same apks would also include ads. What makes you think if the developer has ads on fdroid, he won’t on github?

  • Ilandar@aussie.zoneEnglish
    26·
    3 months ago

    I guess most won’t bother to read the full post and will instead react negatively to the title. Having read the entire thing I am fine with it and would be happy to see more direct competition for the Play Store. The ad thing is only a problem if the store doesn’t include a filter to easily hide ad-supported apps.

    • scrchngwsl@feddit.ukEnglish
      7·
      3 months ago

      I guess most won’t bother to read the full post and will instead react negatively to the title.

      Exactly, it talks about ads in one paragraph of a very long post, and it’s mostly to talk about all the problems that an ad revenue model has for FOSS!

      Honestly people need to RTFArticle. It’s talking about the result of interviews with developers on how they would prefer to be compensated, not definitive plans for what is or is not going to be allowed in F-Droid in the future.

  • dosse91@lemmy.trippy.pizzaEnglish
    261·
    3 months ago

    Damn, never thought I’d live to see the enshittification of F-Droid. I definitely won’t be using it anymore if this happens.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pubEnglish
    272·
    3 months ago

    I never expected this. What a shame.

    Edit: the ads part are not an acceptable add-on for me, as someone who respects privacy and foss. I don’t know of a single foss payment processor (lmk if one exists). A lot of people here are saying “pay what you want”, but it’s that way now, with GitHub donation links; we don’t need this in the fdroid app.

    • limerod@reddthat.comMEnglish
      71·
      3 months ago

      They want to add paid apps where you need to make a payment before getting access to the App. It’s not the same as the current donate approach

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pubEnglish
        71·
        3 months ago

        No, I understood what they’re trying to do. As far as I know, there are no foss payment processors, so adding a non-foss one would defy fdroid’s current foss-first approach.

        Then, people on this post’s comments are saying that they would be good with a “pay what you can/want” concept, but, again, that’s already the case with donations. It’s literally how donations work.

        • limerod@reddthat.comMEnglish
          3·
          3 months ago

          I don’t think Fdroid is so large to be able to create something such as a Foss payment processor. If they could do that, it would be awesome.

          The GNU foundation is working on GNU taler. But, it’s not adopted by any known bank, or fintech company.

          Then, people on this post’s comments are saying that they would be good with a “pay what you can/want” concept, but, again, that’s already the case with donations. It’s literally how donations work.

          The slight difference being its present on a source repository/website and is optional. Instead of being tightly integrated in the app like they desire.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pubEnglish
            2·
            3 months ago

            GNU Taler looks neat. Hopefully it will take off.

            The optional part of the donation payments is what makes them a donation. It can be a fund page, like the buymeacoffee, if the git link is too complicated (which it can be for some).

  • watson387@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    274·
    3 months ago

    That’ll be a big nope, thanks.

    Edit: 20 years from now, FDroid will be worse than the Play store and we’ll have a “new” store that functions like FDroid does currently.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.worldEnglish
    18·
    3 months ago

    But in order to create a solution that will be mainstream enough to make in-roads into the hold Big Tech has on the market

    Firstly, I doubt their users asked them to be “mainstream”, only their want for a piece of the app store profit pie is asking for that.

    Secondly, if the only way to make in-roads on big techs hold on the market is to become just like them, then maybe they should be trying to find a better way.

    F-droid is not going to beat the Play store at its own game. And it shows how naive the maintainers of F-droid are if they really believe that.

    • limerod@reddthat.comMEnglish
      81·
      3 months ago

      You value Foss software which does not track?

      Advertisment part not withstanding

  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alEnglish
    269·
    3 months ago

    Apparently they don’t understand that the F in F-Droid is for FOSS.

    I’m 100% all for adding a repository with paid apps, but it’s not and shouldn’t be marketed as F-Droid.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    14·
    3 months ago

    After reading that post, this sounds mostly like a whole lot of tracking. At that point I think I’ll just use the Play Store lol, it has more selection if I’m going to have the same level of privacy anyway