• dryfter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Meanwhile, in the U.S. I’m sitting here wondering if we’ll even have a flu shot available for next winter, let alone a new vaccine that can protect from Covid and the common cold.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      long covid, aka sequelae (medical term) means you had a long last complication that seperate from the virus. the inflammation couldve damaged parts of your body you are chronically suffering from. it might not help, since its not caused by the virus anymore.

      its basically like having PHN, or nerve damage after shingles, the vaccine wont help you with that.

    • Redditsux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I don’t think it’s going to help them. long covid is past the stage of virus infection. It’s where the body is attacking itself.

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It depends! Sometimes it’s autoimmune, sometimes it’s lingering virus, sometimes it’s disrupted regulatory systems, etc. When it’s the immune system or lingering virus, a new vaccine can often get the immune system to relearn how to correctly handle the virus

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Doesn’t chickenpox turn into shingles by infecting the nervous system?

        Could long covid be related to that?

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          different issues. varicella can cause shingles, when it travels to your dorsal root ganglia near your spine or the ganglia in your head,or rarely it can become dormant in your autonomic nervous system.

          varicella, a herpes isnt the same thing as coronavirus. long covid is just laymen terms for complications or sequalae. Covid can trigger shingles, because your immune system is fighting the covid virus instead of shingles.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          The virus that causes chicken pox, lies dormant in your nervous system, where your immune system can’t get it, for decades. Then much later in life the virus can reactivate, infect along those nerves, causing shingles.

          This is the important part of the chicken pox vaccination the we don’t talk about nearly enough.

          • If you get chicken pox, you’ll probably be ok (although not everyone is) and get over it, becoming immune. But the virus will still lurk, opening you to shingles attacks when you’re much older
          • if you get the vaccination, you’ll probably not only not get chicken pox, but will also not get shingles

          Supposedly something like one in three elderly will get shingles, when they can’t as easily deal with it. As current generation gets old, that illness will practically disappear

          • Ledericas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            the varicella vaccine prevents severe infections, but its not entirely protective against it, it just makes you asymptomatic, and once you get reinfected it can still become dormant, and get hsingles, just less chances of getting it.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Took me over half a year to get over covid.last time. I coughed so.much and so hard for so long I got a hernia.

  • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Now consider that Scripps Research, who is developing this, is US-based and receives a lot of federal government funding, and that Trump/Musk/DOGE have been slashing and burning all kinds of federal science staffing and funding. Also consider that their main federal funding comes from HHS, which RFK Jr., notorious vaccine hater, heads.

    Then weep. Progress on this may be stalled for a long time.

      • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        True, that could also happen, but I wonder how transferable this type of research project is. Does the research lead actually own it and can take it with him or her to a new place, or does Scripps own it? I don’t know the answer.

  • Cocopanda@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    After the most recent flu or cold I had. I would do anything for a cold vaccine. Flu shot likely kept me safe from that last bug I had. But still would like a cold vaccine to.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      cold might be harder since theres different viral species that causes it, and rhinoviruses alone account for 80-90% have 99 different types. flu is worst thought since its symptoms are more severe, and dangerous to some people.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I had the cold and COVID back-to-back. I felt much worse with the cold. It turned into a chest infection that took about three weeks to get over. And then right as I got over that, I caught COVID. I was just tired with COVID. Like I had a fever and some coughing, but aside from that I was just sleepy.

      Joke’s on me though; That was over a year ago, and I still have long COVID. The coughing is gone, but I’m still fucking tired constantly. Doesn’t matter how much sleep I get. Ironically, it means I sleep a lot less, because if I’m going to be tired regardless, why waste the time being asleep?

      • adavis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think “long covid” is something that has existed for a long time, well not long covid specifically but long term side effects of colds and flu.

        A few years before covid I got a terrible cold or flu. Name a symptom of the flu and I probably had it, it was hard to even get myself to the toilet.

        But what was so unique is even after the aches, the cough, and sore throat etc symptoms disappeared I didn’t recover. I was exhausted. Even weeks later I’d fluctuate between days of being fine to the next barely able to get out of bed.

        It took at least 3 months after traditional flu symptoms had finished till that started to taper off. And at least another 3 before I started feeling truly myself again.

    • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      About a month ago I had the flu - the real flu - for the first time either in ages, or in my life, and I actually had gotten vaccinated in autumn, and man, I thought I was dying. For two weeks I couldn’t do anything. Just looking at the stairs gave me endocarditis. I never run fevers and I was just popping painkillers to keep it under 40 degrees. That was nuts. So during and afterwards I mostly been thinking about three things: 1. I would have died for real if I didn’t have some basic protection from the vaccine, 2. I want a vaccine against the common cold as well, and 3. Jesus Christ please I don’t want to die from a stupid cold or flu, at least make it Covid, but that’s such a lowball way to go

      • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I had a similar experience, also a month ago. Lots of people I know had it similar the last few months. Is there another wave of this going around and this time I’m noticing?

        • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          From my knowledge, here in Germany, there was a strong flu wave this winter. Basically everyone I know got a severe and long RTI, but I mostly know other parents of kindergarteners, so there is a big bias. However, it wasn’t even localized to my area, my family is in another part of the country and similar story there.

          I am subscribed to a kind of weekly questionnaire about RTI by Robert Koch Institute, there is also a report attached to it. I remember reading that there was, indeed, a stronger RTI and flu wave this year.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Drowning is probably the best way to go excluding the obvious opiate overdose forever sleepy time. It’s not drawn out like freezing to death.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      121
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Latest FDA guidance: Take vitamin A, wash it down with raw milk, and attend virus spreading parties to build natural immunity.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      17 hours ago

      FDA approval in never.

      I’m not even bothering with FDA recommendations anymore with Kennedy in charge. I’ll be reading the Canada Health and NHS (UK) notices. If it means crossing a national border to get a vaccine, I’m onboard.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        there are some international pharm companies that produces vaccines, im sure they wouldnt mind doing it,. glaxo kline smith is one of them, although people have dislike the company for many reasons.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Theoretically, this could approved in Europe, which is fine for me. But I doubt the pharmaceutical industry will let a working, permanent immunisation against the common cold happen. That would mean billions and trillions of lost business.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        its pretty hard to vaccinate against the common cold, since coronavirus only represents like 15ish percent, the majority are all rhinoviruses there arnt any vaccines for those because theres too many strains(like 200+) to deal with, and also its so self-limiting its not worht it to produce anyway, in addition to trying to figure out which virus is causing the cold and which strain. also there a bunch of other viruses that causes colds, like entero,adeno, parainfluenza, RSV,etc.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m well aware of that, but taking only 15% out of a multi-billion-a-year market is still money. And there has been research into dealing with rhinoviruses in general, too, so that would take an even larger chunk.

      • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I never understand it when this argument is made. It assumes that there aren’t entities out there making $0 on the common cold that would refuse to take the absolute fucking windfall that would be generated if such an immunization were to be brought to the market.

        Like “oh, you know, we’d like to make this immunization and make billions of dollars ourselves but these OTHER guys are already making billions of dollars and we sure wouldn’t want to step on their toes.”

        • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Well, consider all the money that pharmaceutical companies make every year on over the counter medicines for cold symptoms. I’m sure it’s not a perfect example of malfeasance like “hey, we have this perfect cure for the cold in our pockets but we make more profits from our over the counter cold medicines so let’s just bury the cure”, but through a complicated process they often end up at a similar result.

          Recent example: https://www.propublica.org/article/how-big-pharma-company-stalled-tuberculosis-vaccine-to-pursue-bigger-profits

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I sorta don’t understand this. A TB vaccine has definately been around for awhile and the article does not seem to say what would make this one special. Is it the same vaccine with the thing they says makes vaccines more potent added and they are just not adding it???

            • Ledericas@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              i think only the USa DOESNT routinely vaccinate it against it, because they havnt found much efficacy, TB endemic areas do vaccinate against it, but it has limited efficacy. on the plus side, it is used with cancer therapy as a indirect effect to stimulate the immune system.

            • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              It sounds like this new vaccine would be 50% effective (including adults?), according to the ProPublica article. The old vaccine, BCG, appears to only be 37% effective on children, not adults (based on a web search - edit: on a second look, different articles are claiming wildly different effectiveness rates for BCG). The disease kills 1.6 million people annually. In other words, it sounds like this new vaccine would save tons of lives compared to the old one.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The point is that some businesses react rather violently on the loss of billions.

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Think about all the capitalist profit businesses make for common cold symptoms alone, with over the counter meds and stuff.

      No way something like this would be allowed in our current society.

      • SelfHigh5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Just an interesting thing to share… I lived in the US until I was 40 and moved to Norway. They just don’t sell “cold remedy” meds here, or at least not even close to the extent the US does. We have sore throat drops, and OTC pain relief. Some cough medicine but it’s pretty weak imo. I suspect this is because the expectation here is that if you’re sick, you take sick time off work. You can rest and recover. Going to the doc to get sick time approved is at most like $20 and if you and your doc have a good relationship, you can do this via email. In the US, you’re expected to power through unless contagious and even then, just try to pretend you’re okay.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          dextrotomorphan, is the cough medicine, i find it has little effect on coughs. i believes its the 1st generations(diphenhydramine, doxylamine,bropheneramine,etc) anti-histamine that is preventing the smptoms, because also prevents mucus production via anti-cholingernic effects and the cough, besides the fever.

          and pehnyleprine has no effect on you what so ever, you need the pseudoephedrine, but its regulated in the usa, and only available at the pharmacy counter, because Pseudoephedrine is used to make METH. dextromorphan is also recently been regulated, requiring ID, because stupid young children teens, are robotripping on it apparently.

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          18 hours ago

          What you’re saying hits home.

          Conservatives have this tough guy routine, that going to work when you’re sick is just manly or “alpha”. It’s bullshit. Then they spread it so everyone else can get it.

          But the tough thing to do, is go to work, after pumping yourself full of nyquil, or Tylenol, or whatever. It’s just so stupid and obvious. They’re so “tough” yet they need all this OTC junk to ease the symptoms. Not to mention, not being productive at work, cause you feel like shit. As well as taking longer to get better.

          Personally, I prefer not to take any meds at all. Just go home, sleep a lot, drink water, eat soup, chill, rest, etc.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Back at the start of the millenium. Way before even one day work from home was common. I worked at a place where if you were sick and did not take a sick day they expected you to work from home. You would get some ribbing for being in the office and coughing. That place was great. Also always had hand sanitizer and tissue.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          I just got over being sick for 2 weeks and even though I was lucky enough to have that much sick time, I absolutely wanted the strongest meds I could get because I was miserable.

          you’re expected to power through unless contagious

          No, you’re expected to power through and they don’t give a fuck whether you’re contagious or not.

      • Sheridan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        However, I’d expect businesses would also want to reduce cold and covid’s impact on employee productivity? Wouldn’t fewer employees needing to take sick time because of cold/covid increase their profits? Outside of businesses that profit from cold/covid, I don’t see what the motivation for businesses would be against this vaccination.

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Agreed, but you could spin it a number of ways. The “tough guy work ethic” cultural propaganda is to just go to work when sick. The fact that your not as productive when you feel shitty, well, the owners would have to actually care. Their argument is they’d probably prefer a sick employee only working at 70% their normal productivity, is better than letting them stay home.

          The other much bigger thing is, how much money is over the counter meds industry profiting? Do they have lawyers and lobbyists? Is this profit entrenched in Wall Street investors and quarterly profits?

          Which wins? Altruism for the worker bee, or rich peoples money and power?

      • then_three_more@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        But does that outweigh the amount of days lost from people taking sick days?

        Oh sorry America. The civilised world would be making that calculation though.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        medical tourism to places like india, thailand,etc for dental and medical treatment.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Knowing the current administration, it will end up just like abortion tourism… but instead of only being persecuted in red states, it will be federally outlawed.

      • eric5949@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        We’ll have an fda, once they rip it to sheds they’ll stock it with whoever they want to and then say look we fixed the fraud, listen to these guys now. Having a government agency that can say “no drug that competes with an oligarchs drug you can’t be approved” or “yes, you can shove unproven computer tech into people brains” is far to powerful to throw completely away.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          is far to powerful to throw completely away.

          They could do the same with DoE and it isn’t saving that agency. There’s no particular reason the FDA would fare any better. They’ll strip it to the bone and some states will cheerfully make it completely legal for their citizens.

          • eric5949@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            We’ll see. I feel like there’s more value keeping around the institution which says what substances and food you can or cannot sell and who can or cannot sell them than there is in the institution dedicated to making sure everyone has schooling, indoctrination is easier if people are stupid.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We’ve got a lot of Americans who want everything tested for 20 years to make sure your eyes don’t fall out after a decade.

      • eric5949@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Doubtful you’ll be able to leave as a private citizen without a good reason tbh.

        • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          What? I’m going to Europe for a ‘camping trip’. They aren’t limiting private citizens travel in or out, yet. But, I certainly will not be bringing my phone.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          To my knowledge, there is nothing indicating this is the plan at this time.

          And I sincerely doubt we’ll “ever” have that policy. Because the people most likely to go on leisure (or even work) international trips are generally middle/upper middle class who need to be kept placated to make sure they still post memes on reddit but secretly cheer that the fbi is going to protect their teslas.

          Whether other countries are going to block our access is a different conversation but is also unlikely.

          That said: Anyone who CAN get out should work on getting out.

          • eric5949@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            The venn diagram of totalitarian regimes which restrict the free movement of citizens is basically a circle, it’s coming as soon as they think they can get away with it

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              The US is following the (modern) russian model.

              Outside of war time concerns over draft dodgers (which is not restricted to totalitarian regimes), there are no “extra” restrictions on citizens outside of needing a passport. There ARE restrictions placed on “political opponents” but that can be considered an extension of the “normal” restrictions on people with pending legal issues and so forth and gets into a greater discussion of the role of law in a society.

              No. The big restriction is monetary. Which is also how control is maintained and oligarchs are protected.

              The US is rapidly speedruning a christofacist oligarchy. But that is still going to be a lot closer to a Russia or a China than a North Korea. The latter is possible and should be feared but would require a massive shift that takes away the “Things are bad for me but they are worse for Them” that conservatives globally depend on.

              • Ledericas@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                russia mostly, since alot of red state more or less mirrors russia in some form. and they are the ones that had a hand in gops rise to power, and continuance, and funding right wing groups(white supremecist, alt-right). china has thier own problems, and would rather steal tech instead of developing it themselves.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    OK, so if I understand this correctly, they don’t train the immune system to target these sugars, since they’re used by human cells. Instead, they remove them during the vaccine administration so the immune system can train on the bare spike protein. Cool. Now how would this help when new virus copies come in with sugar-coated proteins, some time after the sugar stripping agent is gone from the system?

    • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      18 hours ago

      What they’ve found, from the article, and abstract (alas I didn’t see any links to full text paper, which may come available after the ACS Spring 2025 meeting), is that they indeed do get an effective broad based immune response against coronaviruses. The ‘sugar stripping agent’ process is used in the production of the immunogen (basically a glycan stripped version of the more highly conserved spike protein that occurs in all/ many/ a lot of coronaviruses, i.e. which cause common cold, MERS, and COVID19), such that a broad based immune response is evoked when applying it, some time after the sugars (glycans) have already been stripped. Remember the spike is the consistent (conserved) part, and the glycans are the camouflage bits. Researchers have been trying to come up with something based on the spike protein for some time, and this is the sort of breakthrough that they’ve been working towards. Doubtless more info will be available after the research has been officially presented, March 23-27. (https://www.acs.org/meetings/acs-meetings/spring.html) So it’s literally happening now. And may show up on Chi-Huey Wong’s google scholar page (https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=GQLirSoAAAAJ) or at Scripps/Sinica (https://www.genomics.sinica.edu.tw/chihueywong/)

      • meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Finally, someone speaking actual biology instead of paranoid rants. Impressive grasp of glycosylation and conserved epitope exposure - you’ve clearly done your reading beyond headlines. The sugar-stripping approach is ingenious precisely because it targets what viruses try to hide. Current research trajectory looks promising but I’ll wait for peer-reviewed publications after that ACS meeting before joining the hype train.

        🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          54 minutes ago

          Does the sugar stripping affect any other bodily functions? Stripping is temporary but it still may have permanent effects for some existing conditions.

          Does a coronavirus need to be introduced at the same time sugars are stripped or is it assumed that there are already many in the body?

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          i was thinking the same about the abstract, the glycans were shielding the conserved parts epitopes that arnt prone to mutations, as opposed to the exposed parts of the proteins which the virus mutates much more rapidly. you can say the conserved parts can mutate, but it might compromise the structure of the protein, making the virus defective(it probably does happen, but they dont survive)

    • AlolanYoda@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Yeah I also don’t understand this part. Can the antibodies targeting the bare spike protein attach to it despite the presence of the sugars? Or are there a few spike proteins in the virus which do not have the sugars, not enough to effectively develop antibodies but enough for already existing antibodies to attach to?

      I may have missed it in the article, I’m not in life sciences so I don’t have all the prerequisite knowledge for this

      Edit: this came out sounding super negative, I’m actually super excited about this development and all I want is to understand a bit better how it works

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        from what ive gathered from the abstract,t he glycosolation prevents a more robust immune response, less antibody titers, when they removed it they noticed the immune system recognizes the spike proteins more easily so a stronger immune response and more antibody produced, and a longer titre of antibodies.

        first when they removed the “glycans” it revealed more of the protein of the virus, so the immune system recognizes different parts or more of it, so stronger and longer last immune response. the conserved parts is the parts of the proteins that dont mutate much so its easier to become immune to it, the sugars originally hid that part.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yes same, I see they’ve gotten a positive result so I assume there’s a process, I just don’t understand it.