Tesla (TSLA) has to replace the ‘self-driving’ computer inside about 4 million vehicles or likely compensate the owners of those vehicles.

The liability could be more significant than the largest automotive recall in terms of cost.

In 2016, Tesla claimed that all its vehicles in production going forward have “all the hardware necessary for full self-driving capability.”

Tesla’s use of the term “full self-driving” has changed over the years, but at the time and for years later, CEO Elon Musk claimed that it would mean Tesla owners would eventually receive a software update that would turn their vehicles into “robotaxis” capable of level-4-5 self-driving, which means unsupervised autonomous driving even with no one in the cars.

Almost 10 years later, this has yet to happen and won’t happen soon in most of the cars Tesla has delivered over the last decade.

Archive link: https://archive.is/kJO23

  • theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    TLDR: the marketing lies about full self driving are problematic given the computers of the last few gens are only marginally more capable then a toaster. Some lawsuits have made Tesla pay up, many more might.

    Opinion: do not let your car kill you. Do not use full self driving.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Full self driving isn’t full self driving anyway. You’re expected to sit in the drivers seat ready to take action anyway. Sucks that it kills people, but it’s a problem with the marketing, not the tech which is comparable to other cars adaptive cruise with lane keep assist. Musk should be held fully responsible because the fact that it’s a marketing issue makes it even worse to me.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Don’t let your car kill other people, if your expensive deathtrap kills you I feel bad but I can’t say it’s unexpected.

  • zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ll take “things that might have happened if Elon didn’t cut the department that relates self-driving” for $100, Alex.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This is just one guy saying this. There’s no judge or government ordering a recall.

    It’s clickbait.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yep, my first thought on seeing this was … ‘and who will be enforcing this?’

      No one, the answer is no one.

      While the information about Elon’s history of making false claims, hardware and software details are accurate… there is no official body that has ruled as the title of the article suggests.

      A more accurate headline would be ‘should’ not ‘has to’.

      There is basically zero chance that this guy’s desire would be effectuated in the US … as the US agency that regulates cars… was recently gutted by Musk’s DOGE idiots.

      https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/04/car-safety-experts-at-nhtsa-which-regulates-tesla-axed-by-doge/

      Maybe the EU or China or other governments could… legally agree with the author, and order a similar command…

      But uh yeah, the Trump admin is currently blatantly telling the Supreme Court to go fuck themselves, the law will soon be whatever the hell Trump and his orbiters want it to be, has already told the entire world to go fuck themselves and also beg and grovel at the same time.

      Elon would just… continue doing whatever the fuck he wants, even if another country mandated a recall/replacement.

      Sorry, but uh yeah, we have a fascist government now, the rule of law is dead, the law is now whatever the fuck the Trump admin says it is.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That agency apparently creates new safety regulations but doesn’t do oversight. I think that’s up to the courts? Someone correct me if I’m wrong.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        ‘and who will be enforcing this?’

        No one, as long as their CEO is President and dismantling all the organizations that were barely checking him in the first place.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    As another user said, it’s just a random blogger that said this.

    Musk quote:

    I mean, I think the honest answer is that we’re going to have to upgrade people’s Hardware 3 computer for those that have bought full self-driving, and that is the honest answer and that’s going to be painful and difficult but we’ll get it done. Now I’m kind of glad that not that many people bought the FSD package.

  • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    12 hours ago

    At this point, I’m sure the plan is to let the HW3 cars age out before they could provide the upgrade. It worked on me, I sold my car a month ago without ever getting what I paid for. I look forward to joining the class action suit, but I doubt I’ll ever see a dime in compensation.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Tesla’s use of the term “full self-driving” has changed over the years, but at the time and for years later, CEO Elon Musk claimed that it would mean Tesla owners would eventually receive a software update that would turn their vehicles into “robotaxis” capable of level-4-5 self-driving, which means unsupervised autonomous driving even with no one in the cars.

    Almost 10 years later, this has yet to happen and won’t happen soon in most of the cars Tesla has delivered over the last decade.

    Well yes, he’s a liar. https://elonmusk.today/

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Elon Musk claimed that it would mean Tesla owners would eventually receive a software update that would turn their vehicles into “robotaxis” capable of level-4-5 self-driving

    Wait… so he actually knows what the standard levels 4 and 5 are??

    :-)

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Level 5 is easy to understand even for musk, it’s a fully autonomous robot that requires no human supervision or intervention yet is capable of navigating every single possible traffic situation. That’s what he has been claiming is just a few years away for over a decade.

      And as long as he insists that the only sensors a tesla has are cameras, that goal is simply impossible, with cars driving under semi-truck trailers and through walls with pictures of the road painted on it.

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Level 5 is easy to understand even for musk

        Disagree.

        He says “all” and he probably thinks “all”, but the meaning of it is always “nearly all”. I say, he is unable to grasp that the standard’s requirement actually includes all the rare conditions that happen in the real world.

        Rain, snow, thunderstorm, earthquake, vomit on the dashboard, no internet…

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That’s exactly it, he knows what it means - all. L5 is easy like that.

          He’s delusional thinking that he could ever actually achieve that, but that’s why L5 is so much simpler of a concept than L4, as with L4 you can argue about semantics and details about what exactly it has to be able to do to qualify. Level 5 has no exceptions, it has to be completely autonomous with zero human interaction required other than telling it where you want to get to. If it can’t do it, it isn’t L5.

  • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    13 hours ago

    That’s going to cost quite a bit, what with tariffs on electronics and all. Wait, I had a tissue around here somewhere…

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Some people bet Elons political influance will benefit Tesla in the future.

        Personally I doubt he cares about it.

        Also, if they successfully transform the US into a dictatorship, money loses meaning for those in charge.